Image: Christ Weeping Over Jerusalem by Enrique Simonet (1892), public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.
A God Who Weeps
God is often portrayed in the Old Testament as having emotions: compassion, jealousy, anger, sorrow. These are not emotions in the creaturely sense, but what theologians call anthropopathic language: Scripture’s way of expressing relational truths about God in forms we can grasp. Through such language, we glimpse His hatred of sin, His covenantal love, His patient grief.
And yet, there are few moments in the Gospels more disarming than when Jesus physically weeps. The image of the Son of God — the Word through whom all things were made — overcome by sorrow, is one that resists easy theological categorisation. It is not a parable, a miracle, or a confrontation. It is a rupture in divine composure, a break in the narrative flow where the incarnate God simply… cries.
Remarkably, Scripture records this happening not just once, but twice. Once at the tomb of a beloved friend (John 11:35), and another over a city that would not recognise the hour of its visitation (Luke 19:41). These tears are not incidental, however. They are revelatory.
In an age where love is often conflated with sentiment or softened into abstraction, the tears of Christ serve as anchors. They reveal a love that does not float above grief, but enters into it. A love that is both particular as well as prophetic. A love that weeps over individuals and over nations, over tombstones and temples, and over what is lost yet refuses to be found.
This essay traces those two weepings. Not merely as emotional footnotes, but as theological windows: into a God whose love is not only enacted in sacrifice, but also expressed in sorrow. What kind of God weeps? And what do those tears teach us about the shape of divine love?
The Weeping of Compassion
The shortest verse in all of Scripture is also among the most arresting: “Jesus wept.” It appears abruptly, unadorned, and simply, puncturing the moment with unexpected and weighty tenderness.
The scene is familiar. Lazarus is gravely ill. Jesus, although He had been informed, deliberately delays His arrival by several days. By the time He reaches Bethany, Lazarus has been dead for four days. Grief has set in. Despair hangs in the air.
When Jesus sees Mary and the others weeping, He is, as the text tells us, “deeply moved in spirit and troubled.” The Greek word used, embrimaomai, is unusually intense. It suggests not just sorrow, but a kind of internal agitation, even anger. Some commentators and scholars see in it Christ’s fury against the brokenness of death itself, a visceral reaction to the disorder sin has wrought in the world He created.
And then comes the verse. No verbal flourish. No theological tangent. Just: Jesus wept.
The word used for His weeping, dakruō, is not the loud lament of ritual mourning (klaio) of the surrounding crowd, but a quiet, personal sorrow. These are not performative tears. They are not the detached empathy of a divine observer. They are the tears of a friend, a brother, and a God who has drawn near enough to feel.
What is even more striking is that Jesus weeps knowing He will raise Lazarus. The resurrection was never in doubt. Yet rather than leap ahead to resolution, He allows Himself to descend into the pain of the people present, and chooses to experience the weight of their sorrow before He lifts it. This is not love from above, but love alongside.
Here is the heart of participatory love: a God who does not merely correct what is broken, but enters into it. Jesus is not stonefaced or stoic. He does not stand at a distance, untouched by the mess of human grief. He inhabits it. He lets it move Him. He allows Himself to feel what we feel — not as divine performance, but as a shared burden. The Son who knows the end still chooses to walk through the middle.
And in that choice, He dignifies all suffering. He reveals a God who does not rush to fix but lingers to feel. A God who grieves with us before He acts for us. He does not suppress emotion, yet is not enslaved by it.
The tears of Christ are not a sign of weakness. They are the signature of a love that participates.
Image: The Raising of Lazarus by Rembrandt van Rijn (c. 1630–32), public domain. Via Wikimedia Commons.
The Weeping of Lament
The second recorded instance of Jesus weeping occurs in Luke 19. But unlike the quiet sorrow at Lazarus’ tomb, this moment unfolds in a scene charged with jubilation. Jesus is not surrounded by mourning but by praise. He is not entering a house of grief, but the city of God.
It is the triumphal entry. All four Gospels recount the moment: Jesus enters Jerusalem not on foot, but on a colt, the humble mount of a king. The people line the road, spreading their cloaks, waving palm branches, and shouting: “Hosanna! Blessed is He who comes in the name of the Lord!”
And yet, as He draws near, Jesus weeps.
The word used here is klaio. Unlike the quiet tears of dakruō in John 11, klaio denotes loud, visible lament — the same word used for the crowd’s weeping in the story of Lazarus. But Jesus is not lamenting personal loss. His sorrow is prophetic.
He knows what lies ahead. The same voices that now cry “Hosanna” will soon shout “Crucify Him.” But deeper still, He grieves over the hardened heart of the city, and the spiritual blindness of the people He has long pursued in covenant love.
“Would that you, even you, had known on this day the things that make for peace! But now they are hidden from your eyes.”
Jesus mourns not just the rejection of Himself, but the centuries of rebellion, the pattern of resistance that runs through Jerusalem’s history. This is not the grief of surprise. It is the ache of long familiarity.
This is the love that weeps over refusal. A love that does not grow cold in the face of rejection. A love that laments not only what is lost, but what refuses to be found. The infinite Yahweh has stepped into finite history — born among His own, walking in their streets — and yet, the hour of their visitation passes unrecognized.
In these tears, Jesus embodies the voice of Yahweh through the prophets: not with thunder and fire, but with trembling grief. He is not just the fulfillment of prophecy, but the fullness of divine lament. A King who enters His city not in triumph, but in tears.
Love in Two Directions: Personal and Cosmic
At first glance, the two weepings of Christ seem to inhabit entirely different emotional worlds. One is intimate, the other expansive. One is marked by relational tenderness, the other by prophetic lament. One takes place at a grave, the other at a city gate.
And yet, they are bound by the same divine love; a love that grieves.
In John 11, Jesus weeps with those He loves. His sorrow is drawn from the pain of individuals, from the death of a friend, and from the broken hearts of two sisters. It is personal, embodied, and present. Here we see a love that draws near to the suffering of a single household. A God who does not watch from above but walks with us through the valley.
In Luke 19, Jesus weeps over those who reject Him. His lament echoes across centuries of resistance — from kings to priests, from prophets stoned in the streets to temples turned inward. It is cosmic in scale, stretching beyond one moment to encompass an entire people. Here we see a love that still longs, even when refused. A God who mourns not only death, but defiance.
Both moments reveal the same heart. Both tears fall from the same face.
The weeping Christ holds together what we so often divide: the individual and the collective, the immediate and the eternal, the emotional and the eschatological. His compassion is not bound by scale. He is present in our smallest losses, and also in the vast patterns of history. He does not compartmentalize His love. Instead, He incarnates it.
In a world that often separates the private from the public, the personal from the political, and the sacred from the sorrowful, Jesus offers a different pattern. His love does not retreat into sentimentality, nor does it collapse into abstraction. It moves in both directions: toward the one who mourns, and toward the city that kills its prophets.
The tears of Christ teach us this: that God is not only present where healing happens, but also where hearts break. Whether at the tomb of a friend or at the edge of a rebellious city, His love does not withhold itself. It moves deeply, fully, and without reservation.
The Pattern of Divine Lament in Redemption
The tears of Christ are not mere anomalies in the Gospel story. They are revelations of its very structure. In both Bethany and Jerusalem, Jesus does not simply react; He reveals. His weeping is not just emotional resonance, but redemptive design.
He does not weep in spite of being God. He weeps as God — a God whose redemptive work has always involved descent, sorrow, and long-suffering love.
Throughout Scripture, divine lament is not weakness, nor indecision. It is covenantal. God grieves over Israel in the wilderness, over Saul as king, over the exiles and their return. The prophets do not merely speak for God; they also bear His grief. Hosea marries betrayal. Jeremiah drowns in tears. Isaiah speaks of a suffering servant who is “a man of sorrows, acquainted with grief.”
All of this culminates in Christ. In Him, divine lament becomes flesh.
But Christ’s tears are not the end. Instead, they are the doorway. At Lazarus’ tomb, He weeps… and then calls life out of death. At Jerusalem’s gate, He laments… and then rides forward into crucifixion. In both cases, the movement is the same: into sorrow, through suffering, toward resurrection.
This is the pattern of redemption. God does not deliver by circumventing grief, but by transfiguring it. His tears are not passive. They press toward action and are not reactive, but redemptive. Christ does not only feel the world’s brokenness; He bears it. And in bearing it, He remakes it.
To follow Christ, then, is not merely to admire His compassion, but to adopt His pattern. We, too, are called to weep with those who weep. To lament injustice, intercede for the lost, and bear grief not as an interruption to faith, but as an expression of it. If we are the body of Christ, then our witness cannot be detached empathy. It must be a love that participates: a love that weeps.
In a world that prefers distraction over discomfort, the tears of Christ confront us with a different way. A love that slows down. A love that breaks open. A love that walks the road of sorrow not out of despair, but because redemption is found at the end of it.
A Love That Still Weeps
Hence, the tears of Christ are not relics of a past moment. They are revelations of a present heart. Though the events at Bethany and Jerusalem are fixed in time, the love behind them is not. It endures. It remains.
He still weeps.
He weeps with those who bury what they love too soon. With those who sit in silence waiting for resurrection that has not yet come. With those who watch cities decay, promises die, and prayers return like echoes. His tears are not bound to the pages of Scripture. They are poured out wherever grief finds no words, and hope feels foolish.
He also still weeps over what we reject: the mercy we ignore, the repentance we delay, the peace we cannot see. Like Jerusalem, we often miss the hour of our visitation. We build temples of busyness and walls of cynicism, blind to the One who walks our streets, still calling.
Nonetheless, His love is not deterred. It does not harden in the face of silence. It does not retreat when refused. It moves forward into our tombs, our temples, our histories, and our hearts.
This is the shape of divine love: it does not stand outside sorrow. It walks into it. It participates. It weeps.
To follow Christ is not merely to speak of resurrection, but to trace the same path through compassion, through lament, and through the long ache of love that refuses to let go.
At the center of our faith is not just a throne or a sword, but a Man who weeps.
And that is enough to change everything.
May we learn to see His tears not as weakness, but as witness.
May we hear in them not disappointment, but desire.
And may we follow not just where Christ reigns, but also where He weeps.